The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, in light of the following: (a) the confession of the crime, the fact that the victim and the victim agreed smoothly; (b) the fact that the victim were punished for the same kind of crime; (c) the victim again committed each of the instant crimes during the period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime; and (d) the fact that the nature of the crime is not less than easy by interfering with or assaulting a driver who was in operation;

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.