All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (Defendant A: a fine of KRW 7 million, Defendant B: a fine of KRW 5 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, sex, motive for and frequency of the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, as it is too unreasonable, in light of the circumstances favorable to Defendant A’s confession and reflects the fact that there is no same record of force, and that it is a crime during the period of suspension of execution due to the crime of this type, and that the business of arranging sexual traffic is not somewhat weak by arranging sexual traffic.

B. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as Defendant B’s age, sexual conduct, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is too unreasonable in light of the following factors: (a) the confession of the crime and the reflective fact; (b) the fact that there is no criminal punishment history; and (c) the brokerage of commercial sex acts by arranging commercial sex acts; and (d) the nature

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendants' appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.