logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.03.31 2015고단7915
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, on April 30, 2012, tried to operate a mobile phone store in the Incheon International Public Port, in order to have the victim C (53 years) run in the Gwanak-gu Law Firm, Seoul Special Metropolitan City. 6 dong 858-7.

At that time, there are many mobile phone quantities that Chinese people will purchase as many as they enter the Republic of Korea with leave.

It is intended to return to July 31, 2012 when lending money to purchase mobile phones.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not pay KRW 47 million to SK Telecom, which was released under the Defendant’s name, and was at risk of offsetting the mobile phone purchase even if he paid money to SK Telecom. The Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim, such as having not repaid KRW 11 million from the lending company, such as mountain and money.

The Defendant received a total of KRW 5 million from the injured party, i.e., KRW 25 million, KRW 15 million on May 8, 2012, and KRW 50 million on May 18, 2012.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. Around August 17, 2012, the Defendant forged the Defendant’s private document forgery in the column of “I” in the “place of address” in the “place of address” in the “place of the F in the “F,” the registration number of the Plaintiff’s resident (corporation)”, the registration number of the Plaintiff’s resident, the certificate of seal imprint, and the victim’s resident registration certificate, which is operated by the Defendant, in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment store No. 106-2, for the purpose of exercising the damage, using the Plaintiff’s representative director’s business registration certificate, and the Plaintiff’s resident registration certificate. In addition, the Defendant forged this mobile application form in the name of “C” in the name of “C,” which is the private document on the rights and obligations by signing next thereto.

From that time until June 28, 2013, the Defendant entered a private document in the name of the victim seven times in total, as shown in the list of offenses.

arrow