The crime Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 of the judgment of the defendant and Nos. 4 of the judgment of the defendant are set forth in the attached list Nos. 1 through 19, 21 of the list of crimes.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On August 21, 2015, A was sentenced to a two-year suspension of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court for a one-year suspension of execution, and on October 6, 2016, at the Daejeon District Court for a four-month suspension of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud, and on October 14, 2016, the said judgment became final and conclusive, and the said sentence of suspension of execution became void.

"2016 Highest 751"

1. Defendant A’s sole criminal defendant committed a crime on September 3, 2016, who was employed by Defendant A as a boarding house at the time of Jin-si on September 3, 2016.

At DMoel, this article written by the victim E to “purchase a cleaning machine” in the Internet site NAB and in the country, and the victim made a false statement to the victim that “on the transfer of KRW 30,000, the delivery of goods will be done by door-to-door distribution.”

However, since the defendant did not have a cleaning machine at the time, even if he receives the payment from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to deliver the cleaning machine to the victim.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and managed KRW 30,000 as the price for cleaning on the same day by the victim.

B. A total of KRW 233,00,000 was remitted from that time to September 7, 2016 through the following six times, as shown in the List of Offenses (1), from that time, from that time, the remittance was received to the new bank account (G) in the F’s name.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims and received property.

2. Defendant A and Defendant F’s joint criminal act committed by Defendant F came from around September 19, 2016 and came to live together with Defendant A at the above DNA conference that Defendant A used as a lodging room.

Accordingly, Defendant A suggested that Defendant F can easily impose money on Defendant F, and that Defendant F was defective in committing the same crime as described in paragraph 1, while not harming the police, and Defendant F was in a state where money was needed to go out and was willing to commit the following crimes by accepting Defendant A’s proposal.

Defendants also around September 21, 2016.