logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2018.11.23 2018고정102
명예훼손등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

2. Defendants each of the above facts.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 2017, Defendant A expressed to the effect that “to obtain signature for village compatibility” was a criminal conciliation with a written consent from residents E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, and N, the name and address of which, and signature were entered, but the difference between the parties was caused. Accordingly, Defendant A received KRW 20 million from the mountainous district office located in the Daejeon District District District Public Prosecutor’s Office on November 29, 2017 to the village development fund from the mountainous district office located in the Daejeon District Public Prosecutor’s Office, and received KRW 17 million among them, and received a non-prosecution decision that was not suspected of having embezzled for embezzlement of KRW 17 million.

A. On December 1, 2017, the Defendant prepared a letter of “O residents’ request” (hereinafter referred to as “written request”) stating the purport that “a person shall deposit unclaimed million won out of the total amount of KRW 1,000,000,000,000 from the development fund created by the solar power generation project facilities at an infinite location (hereinafter referred to as the “O-gun”), and then forged a written request under the name of the residents of the above community by attaching the above written request stating the name, address, signature, etc. of the village residents without the village residents’ permission, and then issued or presented it to an unspecified number of village residents of the community community center of Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, where he/she is aware of such fact at around January 1, 2018.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged a letter of request in E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, and N, which are private documents concerning fact certification, and exercised it.

B. On January 1, 2018, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that “The Defendant was subject to a disposition not suspected of being suspected of embezzlement of the Village Development Fund at the Public Prosecutor’s Office,” with respect to the fact that the Defendant was accused of embezzlement of the Village Development Fund to the village residents present at the meeting of the Victim D during the Village Community Center in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Rural Community Center.”

arrow