The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: at around 16:00 on November 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the office located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongju on the Cheongju, the Defendant: (b) stated the victim C’s statement that “C would interfere with the Defendant’s attempted passage of land acquired in the name of Ho-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu; (c) would interfere with the conduct of monthly right and various interest coupons; (d) led to suppression of village occupants through village E; (e) spread of personal attack and human rights through village E; and (e) caused mental and physical damage to many residents who want to take a look at under the name of the public interest; and (e) written confirmation to the effect that “C would interfere with the Defendant’s attempt to use the land under the name of Ho-gu; and (e) written confirmation to the effect that it would go against the obligation of 20 million won to the village development fund; and (e) written it to the purport that “the victim would return it to the victim”.

2. As to the facts charged of this case from the investigative agency to this court, the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the Defendant’s oral statement in the facts charged was expressed while the Defendant made a statement to the effect that the Defendant would have a genuine apology to the victim and live together with village residents, and that the attempted crime is not constituted intimidation in light of the present situation, context, and relationship between the Defendant and the victim, etc.

The term "crime of coercion" means hindering a person from exercising his/her right or causing a person to do any non-obligatory act by violence or intimidation, and intimidation here.