logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.26 2018고단4301
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and a fine of ten million won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall arrange, solicit, induce, or compel an unspecified person to engage in sexual intercourse or sexual traffic, such as sexual intercourse or similar intercourse, in return for receiving or promising to receive money, valuables, or other property benefits.

1. Defendant A and D jointly committed a crime involving sexual traffic after leasing an officetel near the subway E station in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and then arranging sexual traffic. D (undetainedd on April 30, 2018) was a person who was the head of a sexual traffic business establishment, and the Defendant, as the owner of the business, has overall control over the management of the business establishment, and D, as the head of the office, was to directly respond to customers and receive daily allowances from the Defendant instead of receiving the payment for sexual traffic.

In collusion with D, around October 2015, the Defendant: (a) had Russians, etc. employed in advance in Seoul, Gangnam-gu Ftel, etc., to have sexual intercourse with many unspecified men, who were suffering from the so-called “acscoping from mar,” etc.; and (b) received 130,000 won from customers once from customers and received 80,000 won from the rest of the Defendant, and arranged sexual traffic by the same method from October 4, 2015 to March 2018 (Provided, That D shall be kept from March 2015).

2. Defendant B and Defendant C’s joint crime committed the following acts: (a) renting an officetel near subway E Station in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and then arranging commercial sex acts; (b) Defendant C was the head of a commercial sex acts establishment; (c) Defendant B was the head of the commercial sex acts establishment; and (d) Defendant C was the head of the office to directly respond to customers and receive daily allowances from Defendant B instead of receiving commercial sex acts.

As such, the Defendants conspired, around July 2016, to have the Russian nationality women, etc. employed in advance at the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ftel, etc. have sexual intercourse with the unspecified number of men who were engaged in so-called so-called “scams” and in return, KRW 130,00 won per customer.

arrow