logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.08.31 2017고단676
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of eight months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five million won, Defendant C and D by a fine of three million won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, B, C, and D- Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging, etc. such as sexual traffic (mediation, etc. of sexual traffic) is an employee of the said establishment, and Defendant B is an employee of the said establishment, and Defendant C and D are soliciting male customers to engage in sexual traffic by approaching the paths in front of the said establishment, and introducing them to the said establishment.

From March 1, 2016 to July 22:40, 2016, the Defendants conspired with each other, and each of the above businesses; Defendant A was equipped with a lock room equipped with bed and showering facilities; Defendant B and the monet nationality G (Ga name H), I (Ga name J), and K (Ga name L) take charge of the operation of sexual traffic businesses; Defendant C and D took charge of the operation of sexual traffic businesses; Defendant C and D transferred the customers who want to engage in sexual traffic to the above businesses by arranging their visitors who go through the paths in the vicinity of the businesses; Defendant B received 10,000 won for sexual traffic from the customers recruited by the above C and D, provided guidance to the customers, and provided them with sexual traffic with sexual intercourses and sexual intercourses among the above 100,000 won.

As a result, it is obvious that the Defendants conspired to commit a business by omitting the facts charged in the indictment, and add “business” as there is no impediment to the Defendants’ exercise of their right to defense

An act such as arranging sexual traffic was committed.

2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any person not eligible for sojourn;

Nevertheless, from March 2016 to July 22:40, 2016, the Defendant employed a person who does not have the status of stay by employing the said I, G, and K with the status of nationality, which is a 60,000 won per customer, in which he/she is unable to engage in activities outside the status of stay at the said establishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements 1.

arrow