logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.07.20 2017고단3878
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding 5,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant and B jointly committed the crime is the joint owners of sexual traffic establishments with the trade name “D” located on the second floor of Bupyeong-gu Seoul Building in Incheon City, and B provided place and equipment of sexual traffic establishments, and the Defendant decided to manage and take overall control of female employees at the establishment of sexual traffic establishments, and conspired to employ female sex trafficking women with the nationality of Thailand to arrange for unspecified number of gender purchase and sexual traffic and arrange for commercial sex trafficking, and divide the profits from sexual traffic into 5:5.

From February 15, 2017 to May 17, 2017, the Defendant employed E (E, name F), G (G, name H), etc., a female with the nationality of the Thailand, and advertised the Internet commercial sex acts advertising site "I", "J", etc. from around February 15, 2017 to around May 15, 2017. The Defendant reported this to the unspecified male customers, who discovered it, provided 80,00 won of commercial sex acts and provided 160,000 won of commercial sex acts to the customers and provided them with sexual intercourses with the customers.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with B to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. The Defendant’s sole criminal act is the business owner of the business place of sexual traffic in the name, namely, KK building L, M building N, M building No, M building P, and Q Q. From April 1, 2017 to May 1, 2017, the Defendant placed an advertisement for a business place, such as employing a woman of sexual traffic with a non-state of nationality from around April 1, 2017 to around May 1, 2017, such as Internet sexual traffic advertising site “I” and “J”. The Defendant reported this to the unspecified male customers who found, who received the price of sexual traffic of KRW 80,00 from KRW 80 to KRW 160,00 according to the type of sexual traffic, and notified women of sexual traffic to have sexual intercourse with their customers.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The protocol of interrogation of each police officer in relation to G and E;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. A detailed statement of transactions by monthly tax payment, and photographs of Rhographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow