logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.09.22 2017고단815
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 20:00 on June 9, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main business operation by force for about two hours, such as drinking beer in the cooling house located in the mouth of the victim D (W, 52 years of age) located in the village, and taking a bath to the victim and female employees while putting the baby on the fluor, and soundinging the fluor in the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the f

"2017 Highest 1047"

1. On July 28, 2017, at around 19:30, the Defendant interfered with the Victim’s Hop business non-performance of the victim’s head office by force for a period of about one hour, such as drinking at the head office operated by the Victim G, and the customers and the victims who were sitting in the table, without any justifiable reason, who wished to take a large interest, and making the disturbance go against customers.

2. On July 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) found in the instant heading house at around 01:00, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s heading business by force for about 30 minutes, such as: (b) locating in the said heading house; and (c) putting customers with a large interest; and (d) putting customers at a large interest.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement "2017 Highest 815";

1. Written statements of D;

1. Agreements 2017 Highest 1047;

1. Statement with respect to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written agreement;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of the workhouses are as follows: (a) the Defendant’s mistake was divided and reflected in depth; (b) the degree of damage; (c) the victims agreed with each other; (d) the recent hospital was hospitalized for the purpose of controlling his dynamic behavior; and (e) the Defendant’s age, sex, behavior, environment, etc. were considered.

arrow