logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.07.20 2016고단3373
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 14, 2016, the Defendant requested the victim E (the 56-year old) who is a business owner to provide alcoholic beverages from "D main points" located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon on March 14, 2016, but the victim would not sell alcoholic beverages.

The defect business places interfered with the victim's main business of 20 minutes by force, such as drinking alcohol to the customers who are sitting on the table table of the customers, drinking alcohol to the customers, drinking beer, drinking beer, drinking beer, and bruing the victim's will to "be dead, not to be dead," and bringing the victim's desire to "be dead," and neglecting the victim's main business.

On June 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the victim I, a police officer belonging to H District Police Station of the Incheon Southern East Police Station, dispatched by the Defendant on June 9, 2016, at around 04:40, in front of the “G secondhand shop” located in the Namdong-gu Incheon, Incheon; and (b) received a request from the victim I, who is an operator of the above secondhand shop, and without any reason, received a request from the victim I to return home; (c) while the Defendant, etc., who is an operator of the above secondhand shop, is complying with the request from the victim.

“A” publicly insulting the victim by taking a bath, etc.

On March 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 02:50 on March 2, 2016, at the “M” restaurant operated by the Victim L (V, 51 years of age) in Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon; (b) whether the Defendant “M” restaurant (M, 51 years of age) following the drunk customer “a opening of the same year, why is,”

The victim’s restaurant business was obstructed by force by bringing disturbance to other customers, such as bringing disturbance to other customers, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement "2016 highest 3373";

1. E’s written statement “2016 high group 3647”);

1. Statement of the police statement to I "2016 Highest 3921";

1. Application of L’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act, as the punishment for concurrent crimes;

1. Sentencing criteria: It shall refer to the lower limit of crimes for which the sentencing criteria are set according to the standards for handling multiple crimes;

arrow