Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the pastor of the C church in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and the victim D and E are the believers of the above church, and the above church is divided into the ability to support the F pastor including victims and the ability to oppose the F pastor including the defendant, and is in conflict.

On May 6, 2018, the Defendant, at around 10:23, had an unspecified number of churches in the course of the instant church, referred to the opposing parties including the victims in the previous church, and referred to as “gems and girls shall be combined with the two generations,” and referred to as “gems and girls who want to hear the sound of a woman” in response to the victims requesting the apology.

Cor and aftermathing, however, Pacifica

h. We can't see that we can't see that we can't see that we can't see.

D An answer that must not be flick. E An answer must not be flick, and I would like to hear such sound of a woman.

If the complaint has been filed, the complaint will only be made.

Doz. Doz. Doz. make a statement.

"Publicly insulting victims" were insulting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and D;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement of E and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation reports and investigation reports (report on the results of reproduction of motion pictures);

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which bears litigation costs

1. The assertion;

A. Although it is true that the defendant made the same remarks as the entries in the facts charged against D and E, it cannot be evaluated as insulting D and E with them.

B. Even if the Defendant’s insultd D and E, it is deemed that it constitutes social norms in light of the purpose and circumstance of the Defendant’s aforementioned remarks.