A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

Punishment of the crime

On August 23, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) at the Busan District Court. On December 24, 2011, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence at the Busan Detention House.

The Defendant found the business owner operating a speculative game room, and tried to lead a life with a crypous called “abre,” such as giving the game room to the business owner as if he reported to an investigation agency, and having the cryp, etc. sell the dog, etc. at a low price.

On December 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim E (the 46-year-old) to purchase a map of a disturbance in the D Entertainment room located in Daegu-gun Franchi, Daegu-gun; and (b) the victim rejected the request; (c) made the victim’s intimidation, “I will report to the police on the exchange of free gifts from the franch franch or the franch franch franch franch franch francing,” and (d) made the victim’s intimidation, “I will report to the police,” and if I would not purchase the map, I would like to report to the police.

As such, the Defendant received 90,000 won in total from the victim who frightened the victim and frightened the victim and received 30,000 won of the market price from the frightened victim and received 30,000 won in the same manner as indicated in the attached crime inundation table between the first police officer and the first police officer on January 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by threatening the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of prosecutorial statement concerning E;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of investigation reports (fact-finding during the period of repeated crime of a suspect) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. In light of the fact that the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders was sentenced to a punishment for the same kind of crime, and the defendant was sentenced to a punishment for the same crime, and thus, he again commits the crime of this case, it is inevitable to

(b).