A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 23, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. at the Daejeon District Court's Incheon District Court's Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 31, 2015.

The Defendant is a person who has a question that “for the reason that he lost money by going to return to a game room, interfered with his business by avoiding disturbance, and without giving money to the game room operators, he received money as if he reported to the police,” among the game room operators and customers.

On November 19, 2014, when the Defendant carried out a game in the “D Game Center” located in Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu on November 13:30, 2014, the Defendant provided that the aforementioned so-called “D Game Center shall return money invested in the game machine to the said game room E, which was requested by the victim of the business owner of the said game room to leave from the game room, and subsequently, reported that the police carried out an illegal business in the above game room, thereby regulating the police.

On November 19, 2014, the Defendant, “F cafeteria,” which was the victim of the police investigation, sent a “F cafeteria,” which was conducted the police investigation on November 19, 2014, and reported the victim’s 1.60,000 won or more at the 1.60,000 won.” If the Defendant did not give money, the Defendant was fright to report to the police again.

The Defendant, as above, 100,000 won was delivered to the victim who frightened the victim and fright at the same place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement made by the police in relation to E;

1. Each description of the 112-reported case handling table and the detailed statement of processing 112-reported case handling; and

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of each Act and subordinate statutes on criminal records, criminal records, and written judgments (Sacheon District Court Branch of Daejeon District Court Decision 2013No. 1295) related to suspects;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. The Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;