logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.10.08 2013고단7156
부정수표단속법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From May 13, 2002, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Defendant from May 13, 2002 and traded the coefficient check.

On April 15, 2013, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number “E”, the check amount “4,750,000 won”, and the date of issuance “8.30 August 30, 2013” under the name of the Defendant, which was managed by the Defendant in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C.

On August 30, 2013, the holder of the check presented the payment order to the above bank on August 30, 2013.

However, the Defendant did not receive deposits due to the shortage of deposits, and the Defendant issued 7 copies of household checks from around that time to June 15, 2013, such as the entry in the list of crimes, and did not receive deposits or suspension of transactions.

On April 15, 2013, 15 E, the date of issuance of a check Nos. 4,750,000 won due to the date of the actual issuance of the check No. 5,203, Aug. 30, 2013, and the Defendant concluded a contract with Defendant on May 15, 2013, F on August 30, 2013, 30, 4 "H 5,000,000 won suspension of transactions on June 15, 2013, 4 " 5,00,000 won for 5,00,000 won for 5,00,000 won for face value and 6 " 5,00,000 won for 5,000 won for J 5,00,000 won for 7,000 won for 7,305,205,2700 won for national checks under the name of Defendant.

On August 15, 2013, around August 15, 2013, the Defendant issued one copy of the bank bank check in the name of the Defendant, which is the “D” office operated by the Defendant in Songpa-gu Seoul, the check number “L”, the face value “5,00,000 won”, and the issue date “ October 30, 2013.”

On October 30, 2013, the Defendant issued six copies of household checks as indicated in the following crime sights from around that time to September 15, 2013, including that the check was presented to the above bank, but did not receive as suspension of transaction.

arrow