beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Of the facts charged in the instant case, Attached Table 5, 6, 7 and Attached Table 2.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From December 27, 1989, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the branch of Korea bank and traded household checks.
1. [2012 Highest 2366] Around April 12, 2012, the Defendant issued one copy of the above bank household check in the name of the Defendant’s name, "E", "5,00,000 won at the D office operated by the Defendant in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government," "5,000,000 won at face value," and "date of issuance."
The Defendant issued six copies of household checks (total check amounting to KRW 29,270,00) on a total of six occasions, such as [Attachment 1] Nos. 1 through 4, 8, and 9 between the period from that time to September 2, 2012 in the foregoing manner, but did not receive deposits or as suspension of transactions.
2. [Around May 11, 2012] On September 15, 2012, the Defendant issued six copies of the household check (30,000,000 won) as indicated in the [Attachment 2] Nos. 1 through 6, such as the issuance of one of the above bank checks in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant, at D offices operated by the Defendant in Gangdong-gu Seoul, as indicated in the [Attachment 30,00,000] at D offices operated by the Defendant in Gangdong-gu Seoul.
The holder of the check presented the payment of the check to the bank within the period of presentment for payment, as stated in the attached list of crimes.
However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.
3. [2012 Highest 3035] Around June 12, 2012, the Defendant issued two indexes, such as a check number, face value, 5,000,000 won in D offices operated by the Defendant in Gangdong-gu Seoul, and a check number, H, face value, 5,00,000 won in the name of the Defendant as of October 12, 2012.
The above holders of the check presented the above check to the above bank within the period of presentment for payment, but the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.
4. [Attachment 2012 Highest 3435] Defendant I while Ansan-si around April 18, 2012.