Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the owner of a vehicle for the use of D QM5 passenger as a company member, and the defendant A is the person who operates the "F" industrial company in E in the Government City of Speaker.

Although the Defendants did not cause a traffic accident, they attempted to receive false accidents from the victim's modern marine insurance company and to acquire towing expenses from the insurance company.

Defendant

A, even if Defendant B did not cause a traffic accident, towing vehicles could receive towing expenses in the modern maritime driver insurance, and towing vehicles at the time and place of the accident.

There was no fact that the QM5 car was towed to the industrial company at the time and place of the towing vehicle operated by the industrial company in collusion with the request to request the false statement.

Falsely, the standard statement of towing fares and charges is submitted to the modern sea of the victim, so that the defendant B can deliver 51,600 won to the towing cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the defendant A;

1. An accident report, a written claim for payment of automobile insurance, and a written claim for insurance repair expenses (No. 11 once a month);

1. The standard calculation statement of automobile towing charges [Defendant A, Defendant B, claiming the towing expenses of this case to his accounting staff, claiming the towing expenses of this case, and thus, he did not know the fact and found that the towing expenses were deposited thereafter, and did not agree again with Defendant B and towing expenses.

However, the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, i.e., ① Defendant B did not use the towing vehicle in making the instant vehicle available to the industrial company operated by Defendant A on the day of the instant case, and ② Defendant B, in this court, insurance with Defendant A’s accounting staff on the day of the instant case.