logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.08.11 2015고단3990 (2)
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around November 8, 2011, the Defendant and B accepted the insurance policy that “A around July 21:10 of the same year, at the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, the lower court shocked the Defendant walking while running a wing Vehicle C” at around November 21, 201.

However, the above traffic accident is an accident that occurred by mutual collusion between B and the defendant "person who has caused a traffic accident and has received insurance proceeds by causing a traffic accident" in the Dong-gu Office in the light of the day of the receipt of the accident.

B and Defendant 1, as seen above, received insurance as if they were a traffic accident that occurred normally even if they did not cause a traffic accident, and deceiving the victim company by hospitalized in the hospital, etc., and the Defendant was granted KRW 1,424,660 as the name of the amount of agreement and treatment on November 10 of the same year from the victim.

Accordingly, B and the defendant were provided property by deceiving the victim in collusion.

2. B and the Defendant “A insurance company of the Victim LIG on March 15, 2012” in the victim LIG on March 15, 2012

3. Around 20:20, at around 14:20, the insurance was received that “B shocked the Defendant walking along the operation of a wing Vehicle D, from the alley of the Hong dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul.”

However, the above traffic accident is a traffic accident that occurred in collusion with B and the defendant "person who has caused a traffic accident by falsity and has received insurance proceeds by causing a traffic accident" on the ground of the date of receipt of the accident.

B and Defendant 1 filed a claim for the payment of insurance proceeds by deceiving the victim company by receiving insurance as if the traffic accident was a normal traffic accident even though it was not caused, and by hospitalized in hospital, but did not commit an attempted attempt to raise the victim to the victim.

Therefore, B and the defendant did not receive property by deceiving the victim, but did not receive the attempted property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect B:

arrow