logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.11.27 2015고정584
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 1, 2015, at around 23:28, the Defendant driven a DNA car in the state of alcohol exceeding 0.05% of alcohol alcohol concentration from around 300 meters from the parking lot of the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City to the above parking lot at around 23:41 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by witnesses E in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. E statements;

1. Report on the state of drinking drivers, and notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. CCTV image photographs;

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. The criminal suspect stated that he/she has drinking alcohol until January 1, 2015 (the criminal defendant and his/her defense counsel argued that he/she has drinking alcohol after the driving of the instant case, but according to the evidence above, he/she stated that he/she has drinking alcohol until January 1, 2015 (the criminal defendant stated that he/she has drinking two bbbes in the investigative agency that he/she has drinking alcohol.

On the same day, around 23:28, the fact that the Defendant started driving at the above apartment parking lot and completed parking at the same place on the same day, around 23:54 on the same day, and around 23:54 on the same day, the Defendant was driving at drinking, and the police officer F visited the Defendant’s house at around 23:58 on the same day to the Defendant’s home and voluntarily traveling to the police station at around 23:58 on the same day. On January 2, 2015, the police officer visited the Defendant at the police station at around 0.127% on the drinking level and measured the drinking level at around 0.127% on the day of the instant case from the parking lot. In addition, it is recognized that the Defendant was working at the time when the Defendant was appointed at the parking lot, and that the Defendant was working at the time when the Defendant was making a noise, and that he was working at the time when the Defendant’s body and the police officer at the same time.

arrow