logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019. 01. 11. 선고 2018누48337 판결
실지취득가액이 확인되지 아니하여 취득가액 환산가액으로 과세[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court-2017-Gu Group-68731 ( October 01, 2018)

Title

Taxation on the conversion price as the acquisition price is not verified;

Summary

The actual acquisition value of land is not known, and there is no reliable appraisal value assessed by two or more appraisal corporations or appraisal values of assets which are identical or similar within three months before and after the date of acquisition of land, and it is appropriate disposition taxable as the conversion value of acquisition.

Related statutes

Article 97 of the Income Tax Act

Cases

2018Nu4837 Demanding the revocation of disposition imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff and appellant

OO

Defendant, Appellant

b Head of the Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2017Gudan68731 decided May 1, 2018

Conclusion of Pleadings

November 9, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

January 11, 2017

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The imposition of capital gains tax of KRW 45,788,110 (including additional tax) on the Plaintiff on December 13, 2016 by the Defendant shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;

The reasons for this decision are as follows: (a) The reasons for this decision are as follows: (b) Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

○ 14 pages 14 "No. 1" are raised as "No. 1, 12 and 15."

The ○ 5 side 5 side 5 side , "witness", shall be regarded as "witness of the first instance trial".

2. Conclusion

If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just with this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow