beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] On June 21, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for ten months with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act in the Hongsung Branch of the Daejeon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 15, 2018.
[Criminal facts]
1. On March 13, 2017, the Defendant was present at the court of Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun on March 13, 2017 to take an oath as a witness for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. against 46,91 (Joint) at the above court of 2017 order 2017 order 46,91 (Joint) from the above court of law at the court of law No. 213, and the presiding judge before the above court of criminal case No. 2 of the above court, and the public prosecutor’s witness “the witness obtained the Defendant’s d) on the Chinese-style test.”
I cannot answer the question "..."
“The answer was made.”
However, on October 2016, the Defendant received philophones from the above D over two occasions in both the residence of the above D and the front parking lot in Asan City E around two times.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
2. On June 20, 2017, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath in the court of law No. 214 of June 20, 2017 at around 14:00, at the same court of law No. 214 of the same court, 2017 order 187,277 (Joint), and 487 (Joint) G as a witness of a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), and then before the above court of criminal case No. 1 of the first instance, the Prosecutor’s “I do not have any example, who is not the witness of the Defendant (G) or H’s phiphone.”
“The answer was made.”
However, in fact, the Defendant received a disposable injection from G on December 22, 2016 at around 21:00, in return for lending a vehicle from G, from approximately 0.2g of philopon.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A copy of the protocol of examination of the witness (net 2), two copies of the judgment, such as Daejeon District Court No. 2017No. 3187, etc., and a copy of the Supreme Court’s B’s search, examination of the suspect (second time) (second time).