1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Western District Court on May 10, 2016, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on January 7, 2017. On June 8, 2017, the Seoul Western District Court sentenced one year to imprisonment for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (fence) at the Seoul Western District Court on June 27, 2017, and became final and conclusive on October 27, 2017.

1. Defendant A was present at and taken an oath as a witness in the 1st Government District Court No. 5 of the Jung-gu District Court located in 2017, Apr. 18, 2017, and in the case of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. to 4091 E in the order of 2016, the Defendant was present at and taken an oath against Defendant A as a witness, and the witness “I do not ask the prosecutor’s question, “A witness, on the introduction of B, at around August 16, 2015, that he purchased phiphones from Defendant (E) prior to the departure of subway No. 4 Line G No. 1 in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.”

The answer to “,” and there is a fact that the witness has purchased money from Defendant (E) in G Station on August 16, 2015;

Earba required

“I will not answer the question of the presiding judge.”

“The answer was made.”

However, on August 16, 2015, E made a false statement to the effect that, even though he received money from the Defendant prior to the departure of subway No. 4 line G 1 located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, E purchased phiphones in order to give favorable testimony to E that denies the facts charged for selling phiphones, the Defendant purchased phiphones from E in order to give favorable testimony to E that denies the facts charged for selling phiphones.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement while making a testimony after being selected by the law.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant, at the 1st Government District Court No. 5, which was available at the time of the Government on March 14, 2017, appeared as a witness in the case of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. against 4091 E at the 2016 Highest 4091, and taken an oath, following the prosecutor’s question, “I see that I have received injection equipment containing 0.2g of philopon from the Defendant.”

However, it seems that there is a galm.