beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On November 6, 2015, Defendant A appeared as a witness of the case, such as violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. (Composition and Activities of Organizations, etc.) against E, including the above court No. 2015 Gohap 325, the Suwon District Court No. 310, which was 120, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 2015.
Defendant’s defense counsel’s “Is the Defendant’s actual call for a wharf” and “Is the Defendant’s age.”
Madernly, this investigation was conducted, and therefore, this person is deemed to be a member.
“Ar. B. B.S.N.S.S.S.S.
I shall comply with this
He was “I”.
The witness gives testimony as follows: “I would like to know what he or she or she would have her friend in a well-known state”; “I would like to know what he or she or she would have a role in the question of “I would like to know what he or she or she would have done in a F organization.”
“The testimony was made.”
However, the Defendant was aware of the fact that he was the wharf of the F organization E.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
2. On March 28, 2016, Defendant B appeared as a witness of the case, such as violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. (Composition and Activities of Organizations, etc.) against E, including the above court No. 2015 Gohap 325, etc., at the court of Suwon District Court No. 310, 15:00, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 2016.
The defendant was aware of the fact that the police stated in the prosecutor's "E was listed in Ansan and G weather before the old time, but is not related to organizational life."
The testimony was made, and the counsel testified to the effect that the “Defendant E” was irrelevant to the F organization and was not a wharf. The testimony was made to the effect that the testimony was made to the effect that the testimony was not a wharf.
However, in fact, E was working as a F organization, and the defendant knows that E was a wharf of F organization.