A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, C, and D are workplace Dongs, which work together with the U.S. F. E located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

On April 29, 2017, the Defendant, at around 12:30 on April 29, 2017, set up a flat customs office from D in the first floor, Inc., the first floor, thereby making it possible for the Defendant to set up a book.

“A dispute has been interrupted due to C’s restraint while hearing the word “A” and having been in dispute with D.

1. The Defendant, while having been in a dispute as above, brought D’s hands over by hand, brought D’s fingers, and D’s fingers with D’s fingers from the Defendant, and brought D’s fingers with D’s fingers, without having clamping the Defendant’s hand, and instead, D made a false accusation as if D’s fingers with the Defendant’s hand, and received a criminal agreement from D’s hand.

On May 4, 2017, the Defendant suffered from the injury caused by the bones of the Defendant D’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s around 12:30 on April 29, 2017.

“After preparing a false statement of complaint,” the same day submitted the above statement to the police officer in charge at the public service center of the police station located in the 28-ro, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, the same day, and on the same day, after being investigated at the police station investigation and the strong team office, the above statement was made to the same effect as the above statement.

As a result, the defendant reported false facts to the public official for the purpose of having D receive criminal punishment.

2. Around May 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) brought D with C, as indicated in paragraph (1) around May 4, 2017; (b) however, D was subject to assault from the Defendant; (c) was frightened by the Defendant; (d) was frighted to the competent police station to file a complaint; and (d) was frighted to D

When the Defendant revoked the complaint against D and could not receive criminal agreement from D, C only concluded a dispute between the Defendant and D, and C was false in spite of the fact that C did not have any contact with the Defendant.