A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 1, 201, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) with the support of the Korea Coast Guard, on July 10, 201, by the Incheon District Court, on July 10, 2014, a fine of KRW 6 million was issued for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (drawing on death or injury caused before the risk) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drawing on

1. On November 08, 2015, the Defendant appears to have violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (licensed driving) in violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) around 03:40 on November 08, 2015, and according to the report on detection of evidence by the Defendant in a section of about 100 meters from the front day of the department store to the front day of 1174, at the same time, and the report on the investigation of evidence lawfully conducted by the Defendant in this Act (drawing list 1), the distance of the Defendant’s driving is at least 450 meters, but as long as the Defendant was prosecuted as above,

In the case of a car driver's license without obtaining a driver's license, DN driver's license is under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.063% in blood.

2. The Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document was controlled by drinking driving at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, as stated in paragraph 1, and was demanded to present a driver’s license from the E District Police Agency in the Seoul Southern Police Station E District Police Station, and was in possession, the Defendant presented that the Defendant’s ordinary driver’s license was completed in the name of the Seoul Regional Police Agency’s name, and presented that he was the Defendant’s driver’s license as if he was the Defendant’s license.

3. The Defendant forged a private signature and signed the above investigation at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, as stated in paragraph 1, and exercised a forged private signature by presenting it to the above F, who was demanded by F to sign a statement of the situation of the driver working at the city, and to sign the result of the crackdown on the driving of drinking, and to each driver’s column without authority for the purpose of exercising the right.