logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.08.20 2019누55189
감면신청 거부처분 취소청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

. As indicated, “E”;

In entering the name of the corporation below, the entry of the corporation is omitted, and in the case of the joint name of the corporation, the "Plaintiff, etc." shall be deemed to be "the

The Fair Trade Act (hereinafter “Fair Trade Act”) provides service using telecommunications line equipment as a business proprietor, respectively.

(B) The Plaintiff, etc. participated in the F construction project tender ordered by a public agency from April 2015 to June 2017, and agreed to pre-determined the successful bidder, to participate in the bid for the F construction project ordered by the public agency, and to not participate in the bid, or to not participate in the bid (hereinafter “instant collaborative act”).

The details of the collaborative act of the plaintiffs, etc. of this case are as follows: (1) the details of the collaborative act related to the F Project under Table 1 (unit: KRW 5,00,00) annual bidding price * the contract price (other than value-added tax) of the F Project under 12 items; (2) the H Project is concurrent bidding with standard price ; and (3) the remaining 11 bidding was conducted through negotiations; and (4) the 1 G Project (hereinafter referred to as the "instant bidding 1"); (2) the Public Procurement Service (hereinafter referred to as the "Public Procurement Service") 15.4A - the 5A - the 6A - the 5A - the 95 D - the 6A - the 95 D - the 97 D - the 25 D - the 25 D - the 95 D - the 25 D - the 2525 D - the 25-C - the 25 D - the 25 D - the 1.

arrow