The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (one hundred months of imprisonment, additional collection of KRW 6010,00) is deemed to be too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following circumstances: (a) sexual traffic intermediary act does not have much social harm, such as impairing human dignity and undermining sound sexual culture morals; (b) thus, punishment for such act is strictly needed; (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime by repeatedly engaging in the instant crime without pening it despite having already been placed in the place of suspended execution due to the same kind of crime on two occasions; (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime by employing the Defendant, such as “manufacturing”, “head of office”, and sexual traffic; (c) the period of the instant crime is long; (d) the Defendant attempted to conceal his crime by forcing other accomplices to make a false statement; and (e) the Defendant attempted to conceal his crime by forcing other accomplices; and (e) other various circumstances, such as the motive and circumstance of the instant crime; (e) the circumstances after the commission of the crime; (e) the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, and environment, etc., the sentencing of the lower court cannot be deemed to be excessive.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.