Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

From May 1, 2014, the Defendant, from around May 1, 2014, operated commercial sex acts establishments by employing D and E, which are female employees, with the trade name “C” from the first floor of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B building.

around 23:00 on May 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 70,000 from F and G, a customer who had found the said business place, and (b) arranged the said business place to perform similar sexual intercourse in the room that the said customer entered; (c) provided, around 23:30 on the same day, he/she received KRW 70,000,000 from H and I to D and E, with approximately 50,00 won a day average male customer from May 1, 2014 to May 16, 2014; and (d) assisted the said business place by operating the said business place by raising sales of KRW 3.5,00,000 per day by selling sales of KRW 3,50,000 per day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each Act or subordinate statute of the police interrogation protocol of D, E, F, G, H, and I;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The act of arranging sexual traffic in the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not likely to be socially harmful, such as impairing human dignity and impairing sound sexual culture and good morals.

In addition, as in the instant crime, advertisements have been placed on the Internet site, such as the “nurb,” etc., to recruit sexual traffic women, and the business of arranging sexual traffic organized and closely by receiving reservations from sexual buyers through the Internet site of arranging sexual traffic, such as the J, etc., is spreading, so it is necessary to severely punish the business of operating illegal sexual traffic establishments in order to prevent the spread of such illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture.

However, this case is a case for which only the defendant requested formal trial against the summary order.