logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.09.18 2014고정395
공문서부정행사
Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 17, 2014, the defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch, and the same year.

8. 19. The judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant, with female-friendly job offers C, wanting to sound a vehicle at the siren company, but with the knowledge that it cannot do so due to lack of a driver's license, with C having 20,000 won and purchased the D driver's license, conspired to sound a vehicle with the above driver's license. On September 23, 2013, the Defendant presented D's first class ordinary driver's license in the name of the Seoul Police Agency, a public document purchased from G, as above, in order to sound a vehicle at the Frenk in the Gu E during the Ansan-si period of September 23, 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with C to use official document unlawfully.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. G statements;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each judgment, summary agreement and auxiliary association of cases;

1. Relevant Article 230 of the Criminal Act and Articles 230 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Crimes of concurrent crimes and exemption from punishment under the latter part of Articles 37 and 39(1) of the Criminal Act (the crime of unlawful uttering of official documents and special larceny on which judgment becomes final, the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, the crime of fraud, the crime of attempted fraud, the crimes of unlawful uttering of official documents in the judgment, and the crime of unlawful uttering of official documents in the judgment shall be exempted from punishment at the same time in consideration of the fact that the statutory punishment of special larceny for which judgment has become final and conclusive compared with that of imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not more than two years or a fine not exceeding five million won, is imprisonment with or without prison labor for not more than one year but not more than ten years, and there

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act of confiscation;

arrow