logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.02.02 2016고단4351
자동차관리법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Any person who takes over a motor vehicle registered in violation of the Motor Vehicle Management Act shall file an application for the registration of transfer of ownership with the Mayor/Do Governor within fifteen days;

Nevertheless, around February 25, 2014, the Defendant acquired D's franchise automobiles from the representative Co., Ltd in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Airport Dong Kimpo Airport in the neighboring city of Gangseo-gu, Seoul, but did not file an application for registration of transfer of the ownership of a motor vehicle without justifiable grounds until September 9, 2016.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and the Act on Guarantee of Compensation for Automobile Damages is a holder of the said DNA franchise vehicle.

On September 9, 2016, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven the said car that was not covered by mandatory insurance from around 3 km to the front distance of the F.M., the Defendant, at around 15:00, from the front of the king-dong, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si to Siri-si.

3. On September 15, 2016, the Defendant:00 on September 15:0, 2016, published a private document forgery or the event of the said investigation document, with the intent to avoid driving without mandatory insurance from the police officer belonging to the G District in the Singu Police Station G District, with the intent to avoid driving without compulsory insurance, and issued the said written statement as if: (a) stated “I”, “J”, “I”, “I”, “I”, and “I” in the “W” column of the Statement of Vehicle Operation; and (b) written I’s signature on the next page, namely, I was genuinely formed to the said H that he knew of that fact.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged the said I’s statement concerning fact-finding without authority, and exercised a forged statement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The arrest report of the occurrence of the case, the vehicle registration ledger, the inquiry into information not covered by mandatory insurance (D), the certified copy of the corporate registry B, the entry and departure of each individual -C, the removed certified copy (A, I), and the vehicle driver's license ledger (A);

1. A written statement of vehicle operation;

1. A person to whom the case is to be raised;

arrow