1. The defendant is innocent. 2. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) around June 8, 2014, the Defendant: (b) was a bill of indictment in the Seosung-gu Seoul Apartment Complex; (c) however, it is clear that it is a clerical error in H; (d) thus, ex officio correction is made. The facts are as follows: (a) the victim D, who was the deceased, who was in the office of the above senior citizens president, did not use personal money for the job site office of the E company, which had been in charge of the construction; (b) the elderly council, by inviting some employees, including F, the head of the site office of the above E, and was used for the expenses of the elderly council twice from the above F; and (c) despite the fact that the victim, who was in charge of the above senior citizens president, had been using the status of the senior citizens president, had received money from time to time and used it for personal purposes.

가. “정말 피해를 보는 405, 406, 407동 주민들께서는 E측에서 그런 돈을 받은 사실조차 알지도 못하고, 노인회장님 권리로 주민의 동의 없이 다 써버라다니 이게 말이 됩니까 그것도 모자라서 노인회장 자리가 대단하셔서 E사무실에 수시로 왕래하며 애들 과자값 받아오듯 기십 만원, 몇 만원씩 받아서 써온 상태랍니다. 이런 사실도 모르고 주민의 대표로서 E소장님을 찾아뵙고 자세한 얘길 듣고 나니 창피해서 말문이 막히더군요” 라고 허위 기재하고,

B. One copy of a letter stating that “The residents in the complex, disregarding the residents in the complex and leading the former president and the president of the elderly to play, without having been audited by their own representative so that they had been able to have been able to have been able to walked with their mind,” and one copy of a document stating that “The former president and the president of the elderly would have been leading to play,” and three copies of a document stating the disbursement of expenses in kind in the apartment shall be attached to the 620 unit entrance of the previous apartment.”