A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 17, 2012, the Defendant posted an article containing "E" office to which the Defendant on the fourth floor of the Seoul Northern-gu D building belongs as the reporter, "The Elderly Council is behind the Act," and "the director FC of the Korean Senior Citizens Association (m)" in particular, "at the time of appeal for damages to the residents due to the construction work of the apartment-type urban residential housing construction project, the Defendant is from the senior citizens' place of the senior citizens' place of the senior citizens' place of the senior citizens' place of the senior citizens' place of the senior citizens' place of the senior citizens' place of the senior citizens' place of the senior citizens' place of the senior citizens' place of residence."

However, the facts revealed that G, which was referred to as “FC” as above, referred to the Defendant, “the victim H, a “the president of the front entrance unit,” obtained the consent of some residents, other than all residents, in connection with the project for urban residential housing in front of the I apartment in Gwangju Seo-gu, Gwangju, and did not say that “the victim received the above agreement and has been in place,” and that “the victim received the said agreement,” and that some residents of the I apartment, other than the victim, received the said agreement.

Nevertheless, the Defendant undermined the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including G statements);

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect of G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to newspaper articles;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The contents of the article posted by the defense counsel's assertion E that "at the time the residents complain for damage to an apartment apartment-type urban residential housing construction project, they receive money from the construction company with the mind that they want to reach an agreement with the construction company, and the chairperson of the pre-paid unit is also the head of the elderly chairperson" (hereinafter "the article of this case") is true, and even if it is not true