Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Individuals violating the Interest Limitation Act shall receive interest within the scope not exceeding 25 percent per annum, which is the maximum interest rate under the contract for monetary loans as prescribed by the Presidential Decree, for the stabilization of national economic life and the realization of economic justice;

around March 4, 2014, the Defendant decided to lend KRW 20 million to the victim D at his/her own residence located in Newannam-gun C, the Defendant deducted KRW 1 million from the interest rate of KRW 2-3 months and KRW 1,00,000 per month. On April 2, 2014, the Defendant deducted KRW 1,00,000 from the Defendant’s account in his/her own name E (Account Number:F) account around April 2, 2014; KRW 70,000 from the above account around May 2, 2014; and KRW 1,30,000 from the above account around June 9, 2014. However, according to the victim’s statement, according to the victim’s statement, the amount of KRW 2,00,000 per month is a fast food. Thus, the Defendant’s correction is made as above.

B, around July 4, 2014, one million won was transferred to the said account, and one million won was transferred to the said account around August 9, 2014, and borrowed 20 million won over six times in total, and received interest exceeding 25 percent per annum.

2. No debt collector who violates the Fair Collection of Claims Act shall assault or threaten any debtor or his/her related person in connection with debt collection;

A. A. Around September 2014, the Defendant threatened the Defendant, who is the debtor, with the fact that the victim delayed the repayment of interest, that the victim was the superior point of H in the name of “H located in Yong-Gun G in Yong-Gun, Y, and that, in the vehicle of the Defendant’s driver, the Defendant threatened the Defendant, “I will promptly return the amount of KRW 20 million to the victim, and if I will do not pay the money, I would promptly die in his operation from Seoul to the near future.”

B. On November 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at a place where the location is unknown; (b) the Defendant sent the victim by telephone to the victim with a fluenite in Seoul, “it shall be sent to the Defendant, even if the flusium in Seoul, with a flusium in the inside of the Republic of Korea, the thickness of flusium in the flusium Seoul, with a solution to the flusium; and