logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.10.28 2015고정1013
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 29, 2014, the Defendant called the victim B’s cell phone, and called “the Defendant’s cell phone calls to make a monthly class for employees, and there is a lack of KRW 20 million as he was prepared only for KRW 80 million out of KRW 100,000. The current accounting has been done wrongly. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the Defendant’s account on the same day, and acquired it by fraud.

2. On June 18, 2014, the Defendant phoneed with the victim C’s cellular phone and made a false statement to the effect that “The construction cost is urgently required. The Defendant only borrowed KRW 2 million per day and repaid.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

On June 20, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the Defendant as such, received KRW 2 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative D account under the name of the Defendant, and acquired it by defrauded.

3. On July 22, 2014, the Defendant phoneed with the victim E mobile phone on July 22, 2014, and made a false statement to the effect that “I would have the employees of the company that he/she deals with, ask for KRW 1,00,000 as meal expenses, and there is no cash at present. I would have to lend KRW 1,00,000 to her work at home at home on a day-to-day day, and make you transfer to her from her employee immediately.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

On July 22, 2014, the Defendant deceptioned such deception and acquired 13 million won from the victim to the agricultural bank account in the name of the Defendant, and acquired 1 million won through defraudation, etc. on three occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. B, C, and .

arrow