(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.08.22 2019가단5529

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.08.22 2019가단5529

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Judgment on the claim against Defendant B

A. The Plaintiff, who was driven by the Defendant, due to the failure to manage the construction site of the Eunpyeong-gun apartment in the construction site, opened a lid which is located near the construction site, and thereby caused the accident to KRW 40 million and KRW 10 million human damage.

b. According to the evidence No. 5 of this case, D Co., Ltd. appears to have paid the repair cost equivalent to KRW 3,550,000 with respect to the vehicle operated by the Plaintiff. According to the above insurance company’s written confirmation of compensation settlement, it is stated that the cause of the above accident is “an accident that happens due to damage due to the first handman lid in the vicinity of the above C Apartment Underground Parking Lot.” However, the aforementioned evidence and the evidence No. 9-2, evidence No. 1, and evidence No. 3 alone are sufficient to conclude that each image of the above evidence No. 9-2, evidence No. 1, and evidence No. 3 alone was opened by the Defendant’s fault in the above construction site, or that the damage to the Plaintiff was incurred, and there is no other evidence to recognize otherwise.”

Under a different premise, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit.

The plaintiff asserts that against the defendant, the plaintiff sought compensation of KRW 20 million as part of the claim of KRW 51,578,00,000 for the damage related to E apartment related to E apartment, KRW 8578,00 for the damage related to E apartment, and KRW 3,00,000 for the damage related to E apartment, which is examined below.

Part of claim for damage related to lids

A. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff was not in management due to the failure to manage the above C Apartment Construction Site, and that the plaintiff who was driven at the time was suffering from the accident and caused the accident, and that Pyeongtaek-gun, the competent authority, also has the responsibility to compensate the plaintiff for the damages caused by the above vehicle accident.

B. We examine the case, the final judgment which became final and conclusive shall be the parties and the court.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2013.02.19 2012고정4053

-서울북부지방법원 2016.07.15 2015가단15037

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.08 2018나29718

-대전고등법원(청주) 2015.12.15 2014나21763

-인천지방법원 2017.10.18 2016가단226362