1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff A, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance for the acceptance of the judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts written by each of the following parts (only the parts written by each of the parts written by each of the following parts). Therefore, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

Nos. 3-11-2-4 and 23-2. The accident of this case can be seen by the overall purport of the statements and arguments as follows: (a) the part of the last lid installed at the point where the right side begins after the straight line of this case is terminated; (b) the last lid at the right side of this case is opened; (c) the front lid at the right side of this case, and the front lid at the right side of this case, can be seen to have been the wind with the front wheel at the time of the accident; (d) the first lid at the time of the accident of this case was opened at around 07:30,00; and (e) there was no limit to the front lid at the time of the accident of this case to the point where the traffic of the plaintiff of this case was finished; and (e) there was no error in the situation where the plaintiff of this case could be seen to have been caused by the first lid at the time of the accident of this case.

Therefore, the defendant.