Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On December 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 02:20 around 02:20 on the ground that the victim C (54: South) who was a taxi engineer of the taxi he was on the front of Chuncheon City B did not go behind; and (b) f or seven times on the part of the victim’s f or seven times on the part of the victim’s f or seven times at around 14 days on the part of drinking the victim, thereby damaging the sprink that requires treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Statement C in the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant by the prosecution;

1. C’s statement;

1. Photographs related to the case;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant did not assault the victim, and that the facts of injury cannot be acknowledged, as to the defendant's argument under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

In light of the following circumstances, which can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., (i) the victim has agreed with the defendant, and (ii) the victim has consistently expressed the fact that the victim suffered injury by assaulting the victim under the same circumstances as the criminal facts stated in the victim's statement, even though the victim revealed considerable in-depth burden on the defendant's personal relations, etc. with the defendant and middle school, and (ii) the victim has received medical treatment at a hospital on the day of the instant case, and the doctor was confirmed at the time. The victim's statement has credibility and the victim's statement was confirmed by the evidence including the victim's statement.

In addition, the inquiry of the fact by the defendant, the evidence submitted by the defendant, has taken place to the hospital on the date of the accident, and the doctor who is an expert has made the victim.