The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts, misunderstanding of legal principles) Defendant 1 operated a sprink vehicle with the permission of the victim on the day of the instant case, and the bonds company did not return the said vehicle to the victim on the wind that would bring the said vehicle to a security at will, and did not intend to steal the said vehicle.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and misapprehending the legal doctrine, which found a guilty of the facts charged.

Judgment

Witness

D. A thorough examination of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, including the court below’s statement in the court below’s judgment, the defendant thefted the Switzerland vehicle as stated in the facts charged.

full recognition may be accepted.

Therefore, the defendant's argument is without merit.

Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to appeal.