logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.10.18 2018고정639
폭행치상
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around 12:06 on February 2, 2018, brought out food outside the C underground soup room located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu on February 2, 2018, and did not bring in such food to the Defendant’s female prisoners who were taken soup.

on the ground that “the employee has been in divated;

The purpose of this article is to say that the victim's shoulder is "at least twice," and the victim's shoulder was pushed up twice by hand, so that the victim's shoulder was damaged over the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant suffered injury to sugar (profed evidence) with no wife in two parts open to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. The criminal place;

1. Investigation report (as to the transmission to the hospital of the victim):

1. A medical certificate;

1. Ect images by cutting down ct v images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to Ctv video copies;

1. Article 262 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 262 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act bearing Costs of Litigation [The defendant and his/her defense counsel claim that the victim did not suffer any injury due to the defendant's act. Thus, the defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that the victim did not suffer any injury, so there is a scambl, the victim's statement and a medical certificate of injury as evidence corresponding thereto, etc.

In the record, ② the victim was sent back to the E hospital emergency room using the vehicle 119 first-aid services for the victim’s head, ③ on the day, E hospital doctor issued a written diagnosis on the basis of the victim’s statement to the effect that there was an injury to the two skins’ s scambling, scambling, and open scambling of the victim’s scambling of the victim’s back to the bottom, ④ in addition to the fact that the victim was faced with the back of the victim’s scambling the back to the bottom, the victim suffered the injury of sugar, etc. due to the Defendant’s assault.

Therefore, the above argument is reasonable to view.

arrow