logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.02.08 2017고단7800
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 20,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 7800"

1. Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranginging sexual traffic (such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic) is a business owner operating a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of "E" in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D 502, "F" or "G", and H, I, and J are employees managing the above business, and K (K, towing L) with the nationality of Thailand is a sexual traffic woman employed in the above business establishment.

In collusion with H, I, and J, from March 201 to May 18:30, 2017, the Defendant employed a female with the nationality of Thailand, including K, and posted an Internet sexual traffic advertisement site, "M", "N, etc. in the above business place, and advertised the business place of sexual traffic women's exposure photographs, etc., while advertising the business place. The Defendant reported it from unspecified male customers who discovered it, received the price of sexual traffic from KRW 70,00 to KRW 220,00,000 from the above business place, and provided guidance to the said female sexual traffic to have them sexual intercourse with their customers.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with H, I, and J, assisted commercial sex acts.

"2017 Highest 9510"

2. On November 9, 2015, the Defendant in violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act would give KRW 500,000,000,000 to the Defendant, who transferred the check to his/her name in the vicinity of the territory of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

Upon receipt of the proposal, the "Skwikset will transfer the physical card connected to the defendant's agricultural bank account (O) to the name in secret, and receive KRW 500,000 to the name in secret.

Accordingly, the defendant transferred the access media to the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment 1] Facts [2017 Highest 7800]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer concerning K, I, J, and H;

1. Statement made by the police on P;

1. The list of seizure, online advertising printed materials, site photographs, copies of lease contracts, occupant cards, photographs of seized articles, telephone conversations, and transaction details of passbooks;

1. Two facts as stated in each investigation report;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of Q Q;

1. Statement made by the police on P;

1. Account transactions;

1. Each of the Acts and subordinate statutes shall report the investigation.

arrow