logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.10.11 2018고정125
결혼중개업의관리에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

An international marriage broker shall obtain personal information on marriage experience, health status, occupation, and criminal experience from a user who has entered into an international marriage brokerage contract and from the other party and obtain authentication from a notary public of each relevant country of the relevant country: Provided, That where the user or the other party has obtained authentication from a notary public in a foreign country, he/she shall obtain confirmation from a consular official in accordance with Article 30 (1) of the Act on Notarial Acts of Foreign Diplomatic Missions or obtain confirmation in accordance with the Convention Abolishing the Requirement for

(1) The following shall be provided to the other party and the user in writing:

Nevertheless, on January 24, 2015, the Defendant, in collusion with C and D, an international marriage broker, did not provide E with personal information on marriage, health, criminal experience, etc. certified by a notary public of the pertinent country, and did not provide E in advance, in advance, the personal information certified by a notary public of the pertinent country, as described in the separate crime list, from around April 10, 2016 to around September 10, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the defendant, C, or D;

1. Application of statutes on police statements made to H to H;

1. Article 26(2)4 and Article 10-2(1) of the Act on the Management of Marriage Brokerage Business through which the relevant provision of the Act and the former Act on the Management of the Marriage Brokerage Business through which the punishment is selected (Amended by Act No. 14405, Dec. 20, 2016); Articles 33 and 30 of the Criminal Act; Articles 33 and 30 of the Criminal Act; the choice of fines

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion that it is not subject to punishment for the assertion of the accused and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow