Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2010, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) at the Defendant’s house located in Seosung-si, Gyeonggi-do; (b) using a black tool in the form of a real estate sales contract to check the real estate in the column of the location where the indication of real estate is located; (c) on the seller’s name column, “E”, “F”, and “G” in the column of the buyer’s name column; and (d) marked “G” in the column of the seller’s name; and (e), E, F, and G’s signature and seal affixed prior seals on each side of the names of E, F, and G.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a real estate sales contract in the name of E, F, and G, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On August 31, 2010, the Defendant: (a) reported the transfer income tax on the land and building located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City; (b) submitted a forged real estate sales contract as if it were a document that was duly formed, as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police suspect interrogation protocol of H;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a real estate sales contract (a counterfeited copy), a criminal investigation report (to hear a telephone statement from a person in charge of the transfer tax without the World War), and a criminal investigation report (to specify the date on which a counterfeited real estate sales

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of uttering of a falsified investigative document);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the ordinary concurrent crimes (the crimes of forging each private document, and between the crimes of uttering of each private document);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (an aggravated punishment of concurrent crimes with the punishment determined for the uttering of a relevant investigation document heavier than the hostage) among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;