logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.10.07 2013나31605
약정금
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 223,00 with full payment as to the Plaintiff from July 23, 2014.

Reasons

1. The judgment on the cause of the claim is the occupant of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment 103 Dong 504 and the plaintiff is the occupant of the 404th floor below the above 504th floor around the summer in 2007, causing damage to be drained by water from the bend of the 404nd floor below the above 504th floor around the river basin in 2007. The plaintiff resisted this, and the defendant agreed to repair work around that time, and color work on bend of the bend of the 404th benda, the damage caused by water from the bend of the 404th benda, the water quality of the 404th benda and the 204th Ganda, the plaintiff's testimony and construction work on the bend of the 404th benda, and the plaintiff did not have any dispute over the above 404th Menda 24th 202.

According to the above facts of recognition, barring any special circumstance, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the above amount of 404 Vietnama, 223,000 won for color expenses agreed upon, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from July 23, 2014 to the day of full payment, which is the day following the day when the copy of the claim and the application for modification of the claim of this case sought by the plaintiff is served on the defendant.

As to this, the defendant alleged that the plaintiff could not respond to the plaintiff's claim because he paid coloring expenses for beeasia, No. 404, 2007 to the construction business operator, while carrying out repair works around 2007. However, it is not sufficient to recognize this only with the statement of No. 1, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this differently, the defendant's above assertion is without merit

2. The plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable.

arrow