(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2016.11.10 2016가단103499

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2016.11.10 2016가단103499

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 2,232,345 as well as 5% per annum from February 26, 2015 to November 10, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of E Manionion (hereinafter “the instant apartment”) 404 (hereinafter “404”) located in Northern-gu, Mapo-si (hereinafter “the instant apartment”), and Defendant B is the owner of the instant apartment No. 504 (hereinafter “504”) and Defendant C is the lessee of 504.

B. B. B. B. Since several years, when the part of the benda and the toilet tent was corroded due to water leakage (hereinafter “the water leakage in this case”), the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant B, the owner of 504, to accept it several times, but the above Defendant did not take any measures against this.

The main cause of the 404 Vinland concrete cutting is the corrosion and expansion of steel bars due to the leakage of the bend floor No. 504, and the secondary cause is the fall in the durability of concrete due to the aging of the apartment of this case.

The water leakages of the toilet No. 404 is the cause of defects in the process of removing part of concrete or waterproof layers around the drain pipe when the 504 floor lives of the past and the rupture replacement work.

Items 1 of this case (the costs) 797,940 2404 of the cost of waterproof reconstruction, 579,1023504 of the concrete 404, and the cost of waterproof and other construction, 288,988 404 of the cost of waterproof and other construction, 200,536,746, and 200 of the cost of 670,716 5 leakage detection, 200,00 of the cost of 50,000 of the cost of 50,000 of the cost of repair, due to the characteristics of the water leakage of this case, the remainder of the repair work shall be performed after first checking the leakage of the repair work, and the cost of repair shall be as follows:

C. The result of the appraisal commission on the cause of the instant water leakage and the cost of repair for the IMD architectural firms in this Court is as follows:

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry or image of Gap evidence 1 through 7 (including paper numbers), and the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the commission of appraisal to IMD architectural firms in this Court

2. Defendant B.

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2014.10.07 2013나31605

-수원지방법원 2015.07.16 2014나47181

-인천지방법원 2021.04.21 2020가단235851

-인천지방법원 2017.11.08 2016가단210428

-서울동부지방법원 2017.01.13 2015가단131438