logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.12.03 2015고단3738
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On July 21, 2015, the Defendant driven the above taxi on July 21, 2015, and driven the four-lane road in front of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-do along the two-lanes from the entrance side of the border road, at a speed of about 40 km each hour, depending on two-lanes.

At night, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is a person who gets on the way to reduce speed and check the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle well and to drive the motor vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by negligence and negligence, found the pedestrian crossing in front of the direction of the taxi running by the Defendant who neglected this, late to find out the victim F (the age of 44) who was cut by the vehicle signal, etc. around the time when the vehicle signal, etc. changed from green light to yellow light. However, the Defendant did not avoid it and did not go beyond the right side of the victim's taxi, and did not go beyond the road by receiving the front side of the victim's taxi.

Ultimately, around July 30, 2015, the Defendant caused the victim by occupational negligence to die with severe cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebrala in Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a death certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the bereaved family members of the victim, and the primary offender) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1548, Apr. 2, 2007) (the scope of recommendation) is that the victim is at considerable negligence in the area where mitigation of traffic accidents (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1548, Apr. 2, 2006) is mitigated (see, e

arrow