logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.04.05 2013고단81
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 9, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's net support on March 9, 2012, and on September 26, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for the same crime in the same court on September 26, 2012, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the same crime on October 5, 2012.

On August 30, 2012, at around 01:28, the Defendant driven a Crens car with a blood alcohol content of 0.129% under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license from around 15km section from the pre-road of a drinking house where it is impossible to identify the trade name located in the radio zone of the Symyang-si, Gyang-si, Mineyang-si to the Taeyangyangyang-si Intersection.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports and investigation reports (a copy of judgment attached) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (the punishment imposed on a violation of the Road Traffic Act with heavier punishment);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and Article 39 (1) of the same Act (the crime and the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, which became final and conclusive on October 5, 2012) ;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (the principle of equity in cases of a judgment concurrently with the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in which the judgment becomes final and conclusive);

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow