The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (amounting to KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects the instant crime, and the fact that the judgment should take into account the equity between the case and the case where the violation of the Chemicals Control Act (snorting hallucinogenic substances) in all the facts in the judgment should be judged, etc.

However, in full view of all the circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing of this case as indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances after the crime, and circumstances, including the fact that the victim did not receive any letter from the victims, the general amount of punishment in the same and similar cases, as well as all other circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court's punishment is deemed reasonable and too unreasonable,

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, however, the Defendant’s appeal is corrected to correct “1. 30 January 30, 2018,” among the criminal facts (one side and nine lines) of the lower judgment clearly stated that it is a clerical error, to “2. 6 February 2018.”