The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment) shall be too unreasonable.

2. Determination (1) The fact that the Defendant recognized the instant thief crime, and that some of tobacco, which is a victim of the instant thief crime, has been returned to the victim by return is favorable circumstances.

② However, even though the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months for a crime of 2005 for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in 2013 and 2 years for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., he/she again committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime, or committed the instant crime again during the period of repeated crime, and in full view of all other circumstances that form the condition for sentencing, such as the background, means, results, and the circumstances after the instant crime, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is excessively unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.