logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원공주지원 2020.08.21 2020고정23
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A. On April 1, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 17:15 to 17:16, placed in the external display stand run by the victim C (28 years of age, women) located in B (hereinafter referred to as the “victim C”) located in B, and was stolen by inserting two chemical parts equivalent to KRW 8,000 in the market value of the victim’s possession.

B. The defendant was in the same month as the above Paragraph A above.

4. At around 23:49, the victim F (the 58 years of age, south) in Sinju, extracted the majority of the pop-up tree covering 50,000 won at the injured party's market price in G, operated by the victim F (the 58 years of age, south) in Sinju, and was stolen by inserting it into a chemical powder.

C. On the 12th day of the same month as the above paragraph (a) above, the Defendant: (a) extracted a long-term Korean-style Korean-style Korean-style Korean-style Korean-style Korean-style Korean-style Korean-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-style foreign-

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each statement of F and C;

1. On-site photographs, analysis of CCTV reports, internal investigation reports - CCTV analysis and investigation reports (D CCTV verification);

1. In the investigation report (merger of the case), the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no theft of the fire owned by the victim F. However, according to the above evidence (in particular, the CCTV images that the defendant stolen the fire owned by the victim F in this court are recognized to be the victim himself/herself, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant stolen the fire owned by the victim F as stated in the crime B. Accordingly, the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion is not accepted).

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Considerations, such as the two-time criminal records of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the fact that an agreement was reached with the victim C but the agreement was not reached with the victim F

arrow