logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.05.29 2013고단1155
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On January 10, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Southern District Court, and a fine of one million won for the same crime at the same court on August 3, 2010, respectively.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On April 4, 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.081% without a vehicle driver’s license on April 4, 2013, the Defendant driven B-V car at approximately 300 meters from the front day of the “gold Investigation”-168, which is located in the Newdong in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, from the front day of the “gold Investigation” model to the front day of the same 85-168.

2. Illegal uttering of official documents, fabrication of private documents, and uttering of an official document was discovered at the same time and place as set forth in Paragraph 1, and the Defendant illegally exercised official document by presenting the same birth D driver’s license under the name of the Seoul National Police Agency Commissioner of the Seoul National Police Agency, who was in possession of a person who was requested to present a driver’s license by C from the police officers belonging to the Seoul National Police Agency, as the Defendant was the Defendant

With the aim of continuously exercising authority, the Defendant stated in the driver’s statement column of the report on the circumstantial statement of the driver in the driver’s statement column of the driver’s statement, “I am on one-way and one-way operation after acting as an agent, I am on one-way operation. I am on the name column and “D” respectively, and marked off by his name.

As a result, the Defendant forged a copy of the circumstantial statement of the state driver in the name of D, which is a private document related to the certification of facts, and issued it to the above C as if it was a document duly formed at the seat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Statement on the circumstantial statement of a host driver prepared in D name;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Investigation report (No. 6 No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes by inquiry and inquiry;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting the crime; and

arrow